{"status":"ok","html":"\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/td><\/tr><\/table>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t <\/a><\/div>\r\n <\/th>\r\n \r\n
Paul_Schmitz<\/a> commented on a news article<\/a> Nov 9th 2016, 12:27am<\/small><\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t
Joe: You are correct. I wrote the paragraph first and my calculations for predicting the Nike regional meet came out slightly different the finish at Utah. I didn't go to the merged results, I used my own database. I use more than one meet to predict results and Springville came up just short. Looking at their times just from the state meet they very well could be a team on the podium at Nike Southwest. It gets REALLY close after AF down to #8 in the region. I personally still think Davis could jump some teams, but I couldn't find the data to back up my hunch.<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t
<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/table><\/div><\/th>
Regional Rankings Boys XC 2016 - 11\/3 - DyeStat<\/a><\/div>
Boys Regional Rankings, 11\/3\/16\n\r\n \n\r...<\/div>
Published by: <\/span>\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\t\t\t\t
\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/td><\/tr><\/table>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\t <\/a><\/div><\/div>\r\n\t\t<\/div><\/td><\/tr><\/table>\r\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
<\/span><\/span>Like<\/a>·<\/span><\/span>Comment<\/a>·<\/span><\/span>Share<\/a>·<\/span><\/span>E-mail<\/a>·<\/span>41832 views<\/span>  <\/a><\/div>\r\n\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n
\n\n<\/span>0 shares:<\/span>DyeStat XC RANKINGS<\/a>, DyeStat.com<\/a>, DyeStatCAL.com<\/a>, DyeStatFL.com<\/a>\t\t<\/span><\/span><\/td>view all<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/table>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n
\n\n
\n\n<\/span>0<\/span> likes:<\/span><\/span><\/td><\/tr><\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n